The Market Basket Brand Is In Turmoil – Again!
Chris Langathianos • June 2, 2025
In a return to a story that Brandigo first covered in 2014, Market Basket, a New England grocery chain with a history of family disputes, is facing another leadership crisis in 2025. Well-loved CEO Arthur T. Demoulas has been suspended by the board, leading to divided customer opinions and employee unrest. Here's a quick breakdown of the current turmoil:
- What happened?
Arthur T. was accused of resisting oversight and planning a work stoppage. The board claims he acted without accountability, while Arthur T.'s team calls it a hostile takeover.
- Impact on customers:
A survey shows 55% of shoppers plan to boycott the store during the crisis, echoing the 2014 protests that nearly collapsed the company.
- Employee morale:
Internal reviews reveal slipping satisfaction, with only 51% of employees optimistic about the company's future.
- Bigger issues:
Governance problems, succession disputes, and poor crisis communication are fueling instability.
Market Basket must act fast to rebuild trust, stabilize operations, and address long-standing governance challenges to avoid repeating its history of turmoil.
Data Behind the Brand Problems
Customer Opinion and Shopping Pattern Changes
The numbers paint a clear picture of Market Basket's current struggles. A Boston.com survey with around 400 participants revealed that 55% of respondents have no plans to shop at Market Basket as long as Arthur T. Demoulas remains on leave
[2]. Social media reactions are just as divided, with customers passionately aligning themselves on either side of the debate.
This turmoil comes at a particularly challenging time. With many shoppers keeping a closer eye on their budgets, any disruption at a low-cost retailer like Market Basket could have serious consequences. Customers are especially wary of changes that might affect the store's reputation for low prices, making it harder to maintain loyalty during such a volatile period [2].
The echoes of Market Basket's 2014 crisis are hard to ignore, with some customers already calling for boycotts, showing just how deep the divide runs. This external tension mirrors internal struggles, as employee feedback also highlights a growing sense of instability.
Employee Satisfaction and Turnover Data
While customer sentiment reflects growing distrust, internal data reveals management issues that can't be overlooked. Glassdoor ratings for Market Basket stand at 3.6 out of 5 from 1,373 reviews, though this score has dropped by 1% over the past year [3]. These numbers suggest that employee satisfaction is slipping, adding another layer to the company's challenges.
Employee loyalty shows mixed results. 59% of employees say they would recommend Market Basket to a friend, but only 51% have a positive outlook on the company's future [3]. This uncertainty underscores the impact of the ongoing leadership crisis on morale.
Pay and benefits are recurring pain points. Employees rate compensation and benefits at 3.1 out of 5, with many citing low wages and poor management as common complaints. On the flip side, positive feedback often highlights flexible hours and the camaraderie among coworkers [3].
Interestingly, conflicting data paints a more positive picture. Another Glassdoor report gives Market Basket a higher rating of 3.8 out of 5, with 79% of employees recommending the company to a friend and 93% approving of the CEO [6]. These discrepancies suggest that employee sentiment is highly reactive and may shift based on recent developments, such as the current leadership uncertainty.
Leadership plays a critical role in employee satisfaction. According to broader workplace trends, 75% of employees who voluntarily leave their jobs do so because of issues with their boss, while 79% cite a lack of appreciation as a key reason for quitting [4]. For Market Basket, the leadership crisis could pose a serious threat to retaining its workforce.
The company's philosophy emphasizes teamwork, encapsulated in their belief that:
"We are all equal and by working together and only together do we succeed"
[5]
However, this principle is being tested as employees face the uncertainty surrounding the suspension of their CEO. How well the company navigates this period will likely determine whether it can maintain its team-oriented culture.
What Caused the Crisis
Management and Leadership Problems
The turmoil at Market Basket largely stems from deep-rooted issues in corporate governance. At the center of the storm is Arthur T. Demoulas, whose leadership style has long been criticized for lacking oversight and accountability - a concern the board has raised repeatedly over the years.
Board Chairman Jay Hachigian didn’t mince words when addressing the situation:
"Mr. Demoulas has acted for years as if he owns the entire company and can make every
decision, big and small, without discussion or accountability to anyone. He has essentially hijacked this
company for himself, and when the board put its foot down, he started to make plans to
boycott and harm the company. It's simple: he wants it his way or no way. And that's not the way
a CEO and minority owner like Arthur can be allowed to continue to conduct himself."
[7]
The ownership structure of Market Basket paints a clear picture of imbalance. Arthur T. Demoulas holds only 28% of the company, while his three sisters collectively control a dominant 60% share [7]. Despite being a minority owner, Arthur T. often bypassed the board, making unilateral decisions that fueled internal tensions.
One of the key flashpoints was his resistance to succession planning. He pushed to appoint his children to leadership roles without consulting the board and failed to submit a company budget for over five years [7][8][10]. The situation reached a boiling point when the board accused him of orchestrating a potential work stoppage after it demanded greater access to key employees [10].
These governance failures not only strained internal relationships but also set the stage for a communication breakdown during the crisis.
Poor Crisis Communication
The leadership struggles were compounded by Market Basket's inability to manage the crisis effectively through communication. When the crisis unfolded, Arthur T. Demoulas’s spokesperson, Justine Griffin, escalated tensions by labeling the board’s actions as a “hostile takeover” and dismissing their reasoning as a "farcical cover" [9].
On the other side, the board framed its actions as necessary for ensuring proper corporate governance. However, Market Basket's lack of a strong digital presence and a proactive communication strategy left the company ill-equipped to control the narrative. This vacuum allowed negative perceptions to spread unchecked.
Board member Steven J. Collins attempted to redirect the focus with a statement emphasizing the company’s broader role:
"Market Basket stores are community anchors. The board must act
in the company's best interest to preserve our future."
[11]
Despite these efforts, the company’s messaging failed to address the concerns of employees and customers, who were already disheartened by another public clash within the Demoulas family. The absence of a well-thought-out crisis communication plan, coupled with ineffective internal communication, only deepened the uncertainty and eroded trust among stakeholders.
Recovery Plan for Market Basket
Market Basket needs to act swiftly to rebuild trust and restore its reputation. The key to recovery lies in addressing three critical areas: repairing relationships with employees and customers, restructuring its management practices, and adopting data-driven strategies to prevent future crises. These steps can help reconnect the company with its stakeholders and set the stage for a stronger future.
Fixing Relationships with Employees and Customers
Rebuilding trust starts with acknowledging past mistakes. Market Basket must address the internal conflicts that have impacted its workforce. This means fostering open communication, providing regular training, and offering performance-based incentives to re-engage employees and rebuild morale [13][14]. At the same time, a well-designed customer loyalty program can help win back shoppers. Focus on offering simple, tangible perks that deliver real value [12][13].
Statistics show that loyalty programs resonate strongly with consumers. Over 60% of U.S. shoppers are willing to pay for memberships that include exclusive perks and better experiences. This appeal spans generations, with 71% of Gen X, 70% of Millennials, 63% of Baby Boomers, and 62% of Gen Z expressing interest [12]. Additionally, customers who redeem rewards can generate 15–25% more revenue annually, and loyal customers are 88% more likely to make repeat purchases [12].
Jeffrey Casullo, Senior Manager at Monitor Deloitte, highlights the importance of simplicity in loyalty programs:
"simplicity and ease" are more important than "personalization" for loyalty users
[12].
By focusing on easy-to-understand rewards, maintaining clean and inviting stores, and improving the overall shopping experience [13], Market Basket can rebuild customer confidence and encourage long-term loyalty.
Updating Management Structure
Market Basket must address its governance challenges to create a stable foundation for the future. This includes clarifying leadership roles, implementing independent oversight, and establishing a formal succession plan. Leadership training, transparent decision-making criteria, and neutral conflict resolution processes are essential to separate family disputes from business operations [15].
Regular communication forums with clear agendas and documented outcomes can further improve governance. These forums ensure that leadership remains aligned on priorities and that both board and customer concerns are addressed effectively.
Using Data to Prevent Future Problems
Data analytics can play a key role in identifying and addressing potential issues before they grow into larger problems. Market Basket can use differential market basket analysis to review customer purchase patterns, optimize store layouts, and refine marketing strategies [19][16]. Predictive analytics and association rule mining can help the company spot emerging trends, improve cross-selling opportunities, and design effective promotions. Integrating AI tools can also provide real-time insights into customer sentiment [16][17][18][19].
Joe Bogner from INSIGHT2PROFIT explains the value of market basket analysis:
"Market basket analysis mines historical patterns in customer behavior to better inform your
business in how to best nurture the health and wealth of your customers"
[17].
This approach is particularly impactful, as even a modest 5% boost in customer retention can result in a profit increase of 25–95% [17]. By leveraging data effectively, Market Basket can make informed decisions that benefit both customers and the business.
What We Learned and Next Steps
The recurring governance crises at Market Basket highlight the importance of clear succession planning, strong stakeholder alignment, and independent oversight. These takeaways provide a framework for fostering long-term brand strength, as explored below.
Main Lessons from Market Basket's Problems
Market Basket's challenges offer several key insights. Family businesses must prioritize structured succession planning to avoid leadership disputes. For example, Arthur T. Demoulas's insistence on unilaterally appointing his children as successors underscored the risks of resisting formal transitions [8].
Effective stakeholder alignment can become a strategic advantage. During the 2014 crisis, Market Basket's sales plummeted by over 90% due to employee protests and customer boycotts [1]. Yet, by 2022, the company had rebounded to become the top-performing retailer in the U.S., with unmatched customer retention [1]. This recovery was fueled by employees' sense of ownership and commitment to the brand's success.
MIT Sloan Adjunct Associate Professor of Operations Management Zeynep Ton encapsulated this principle:
"People are not a cost, people can be a strategic asset"
[20].
Governance structures must separate family interests from business operations. The current crisis exposed critical governance failures, underscoring the need for independent oversight, clear decision-making processes, and impartial conflict resolution mechanisms.
Additionally, robust crisis communication is vital. When internal disputes become public, the resulting uncertainty can destabilize an organization. Store manager Jamie Cunneen reflected this sentiment, saying:
"Mr. Demoulas, ATD, is the heart and soul of Market Basket. Everything that this place is built upon, it's him"
[8].
Building Long-Term Brand Strength
Customer loyalty and employee satisfaction data emphasize the urgency of turning these lessons into actionable strategies. To ensure lasting success, Market Basket must focus on institutionalizing reforms.
Distributed leadership and formal governance are essential to shifting from reliance on individual personalities to sustainable systems. As MIT Sloan Seley Distinguished Professor of Management Deborah Ancona notes:
"Distributed leadership works. Loyalty breeds loyalty. You need leaders at the top, at the middle, and at the bottom"
[20].
Empowering the community through an inclusive organizational culture further enhances resilience. Market Basket's approach of valuing both employees and customers has been instrumental, as demonstrated by its 2012 operating margin of 7.2%, which outperformed Walmart's 5.9% [21].
Finally, building long-term relationships requires consistent dedication to all stakeholders. Market Basket's ability to maintain customer loyalty during crises proves that enduring brand strength relies on robust systems rather than individual leadership.
For Market Basket and similar companies, the way forward lies in transforming personal loyalty into institutional resilience. By establishing solid governance structures and fostering a collective organizational culture, businesses can better navigate challenges and secure long-term success.
Why Client–Consultancy Synergy is Critical to a Successful Brand Research Project
Tesla's recent struggles show how controversies can damage a brand. CEO Elon Musk's recent controvercial decisions have alienated a significant portion of Tesla's eco-conscious customer base. The fallout has been severe: Stock Decline: Tesla's stock dropped 36% in Q1 2025, erasing $460B in market cap. Sales Impact: Vehicle deliveries fell 13% year-over-year in Q1 2025, with market share in Europe and Germany plummeting. Customer Trust: Favorability among Democrats dropped 23% from January to July 2024, while Tesla's brand consideration score halved since 2021. This highlights a key lesson: brands risk fallout when taking sides on divisive issues, and this is particularly true in politics. It highlights how important it for brands to remain focused on their core mission, establish authenticity, and earn trust from the market. You may be asking yourself, well hold on, how is this any different that what other brands like Ben and Jerry’s have done over the years. The key difference is that even though they may express views that some may find divisive, these views didn’t counter their core brand essence, in fact it enhanced it. Conflicts Hurting Brand Performance Brand Value Losses Tesla experienced a hit to its brand value following statements from its CEO that many perceived to be divisive or off-brand. Survey results showed that 45% of respondents viewed the impact as "negative," while 40% described it as "extremely negative" [2] . Customer Trust Breakdown Tesla's favorability ratings have sharply declined, particularly across political affiliations: